The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the Progress of a Tallgrass Prairie Restoration in Southern Wisconsin
Abstract
Assessments of ecosystem restorations are necessary to improve restoration practices and goals. Restoration assessments, whether quantitative or qualitative, are also a vital part of managing previously degraded ecosystems. This study examined some of the key structural and functional characteristics and processes of a tallgrass prairie restoration near Arlington, Wisconsin for 5 y, 19 to 24 y after beginning restoration from cultivation, including mean annual drainage, N and C leaching, soil organic matter, pH, extractable P and K, total N and C contents, above- and belowground net primary production, leaf area index, soil surface CO2 flux and net N-mineralization. Total soil N and C contents of the prairie restoration were compared to other nearby prairie restorations, remnants and an adjacent agricultural field, all on similar soil, to determine the degree of change in ecosystem properties as a result of ecological restoration. Soil properties and processes and vegetation characteristics varied annually throughout the 5-y assessment period, but most soil properties showed no significant temporal trend. Only soil N content in the 0–30 cm layer increased significantly in the 5-y period, but the rate of N increase did not coincide with the rate typical of N inputs to a prairie. Results suggest that most soil properties have either already come to some equilibrium with the surrounding environment or their rates of change were too small to measure over 5 y. This study demonstrates the difficulties of ascribing changes in ecosystem properties to restoration. The spatial and temporal variability and slow rates of change make it difficult to discern differences between restored, disturbed and natural ecosystems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Restored prairie soils often do not have the same soil properties as remnant prairies, often with lower total nitrogen, organic matter, and total carbon [7,23,24], though [23] and [24] found the bulk density of restored prairie sites to be at or above the range of remnants, and [21] found higher N and P levels in restored versus reference prairies.”
From From the Ground Up: Prairies on Reclaimed Mine Land—Impacts on Soil and Vegetation (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Most prairie restoration studies focus on conversion from agriculture [7,20,21,69].”
From From the Ground Up: Prairies on Reclaimed Mine Land—Impacts on Soil and Vegetation (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“For instance, one study found soil organic C to decrease the first two years after a grassland restoration, increase for a few years, and decrease again between 15-24 years after restoration [7].”
From From the Ground Up: Prairies on Reclaimed Mine Land—Impacts on Soil and Vegetation (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“One study [7] estimates that it takes about 19-24 years after conversion from agriculture to prairie before vegetation, hydrologic, and soil biogeochemical processes stabilize”
From From the Ground Up: Prairies on Reclaimed Mine Land—Impacts on Soil and Vegetation (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
DETERMINATION OF TOTAL, ORGANIC, AND AVAILABLE FORMS OF PHOSPHORUS IN SOILS
Bray, R. H., & Kurtz, L. T. (1945) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006 · Cited by 7,902
McLean, E. O. (1982) · Agronomy monograph/Agronomy · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c12 · Cited by 3,330
An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics
Campbell, G. S. (1977) · Heidelberg science library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9917-9 · Cited by 3,247
Towards a Conceptual Framework for Restoration Ecology
Hobbs, R. J., & Norton, D. A. (1996) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.1996.tb00112.x · Cited by 1,276
Curtis, J. T. (1959) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196003000-00012 · Cited by 1,205
Instrument for Indirect Measurement of Canopy Architecture
Welles, J. M., & Norman, J. M. (1991) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300050009x · Cited by 922
Self-citationThe Vegetation of Wisconsin. An Ordination of Plant Communities.
Greig-Smith, P. W., & Curtis, J. T. (1961) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2257277 · Cited by 796
Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment
Knops, J. M. H., & Tilman, D. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0088:dosnac]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 595
Tracking Wetland Restoration: Do Mitigation Sites Follow Desired Trajectories?
Zedler, J. B., & Callaway, J. C. (1999) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.1999.07108.x · Cited by 501
Haynes, B. E., & Gower, S. T. (1995) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/15.5.317 · Cited by 431
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Use of multiple criteria in an ecological assessment of a prairie restoration chronosequence
Hansen, M. J., & Gibson, D. J. (2014) · Applied Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/avsc.12051 · Cited by 74
Assessment of long-term tallgrass prairie restoration in Manitoba, Canada
McLachlan, S. M., & Knispel, A. L. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.014 · Cited by 62
From the Ground Up: Prairies on Reclaimed Mine Land—Impacts on Soil and Vegetation
Swab, R. M., Lorenz, N., Lee, N. R., Culman, S. W., & Dick, R. P. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9110455 · Cited by 13
“These goals can include increasing plant species richness, diversity, native cover [1,3,4], plant community structure and species composition [4–6], and soil health [7].”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- BRYE, K. R., NORMAN, J. M., & GOWER, S. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Arkansas System (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- BRYE, K. R.
- ORCID
- BRYE, K. R.
- Venue
- The American Midland Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Notre Dame
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 218
- ISSN
- 0003-0031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014763253
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Midland Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Plant Ecology and Soil Science
- Keywords
- tallgrass prairie restoration, restoration evaluation, soil nitrogen, soil carbon, soil organic matter, net primary productivity, leaf area index, soil CO2 flux, nitrogen mineralization, nitrogen leaching, phosphorus and potassium availability, soil pH, drainage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the Progress of a Tallgrass Prairie Restoration in Southern Wisconsin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1674/0003-0031(2002)148%5B0218:atpoat%5D2.0.co;2
- The paper
- BRYE, K. R., NORMAN, J. M., & GOWER, S. T. (2002). Assessing the Progress of a Tallgrass Prairie Restoration in Southern Wisconsin. The American Midland Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2002)148%5B0218%3Aatpoat%5D2.0.co%3B2